Pengembangan dan Validitas Instrumen Tes untuk Mengukur Ketercapaian Pembelajaran Mendalam Mata Kuliah Pendahuluan Fisika Inti
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.58466/sda4p316Keywords:
Model ADDIE, Validitas Instrumen, Taksonomi SOLO, Keterampilan 6C, Pendahuluan Fisika IntiAbstract
The Introduction to Nuclear Physics course, which is full of abstract and mathematical concepts, is still evaluated using conventional methods based on rote memorization (surface learning). In fact, a deep learning approach that emphasizes conceptual connections is far more relevant for assessing students’ competence in comprehending nuclear phenomena holistically. This study aims to develop and validate a test instrument to measure the achievement of deep learning in the Introduction to Nuclear Physics course, which is oriented toward producing high-caliber nuclear energy professionals. The study employs the ADDIE model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). The indicators of deep learning achievement are based on the 6C skills (Character, Citizenship, Collaboration, Communication, Critical Thinking, and Creativity). The instruments comprise three main components: a contextual essay test with a SOLO-based scoring rubric for the critical thinking and creativity dimensions; self-assessment and peer-assessment questionnaires for the character and citizenship dimensions; and a project rubric for the collaboration and communication dimensions. Data were collected through expert validation involving three experts and analyzed using Aiken’s V index. The results of the study show that the essay test instrument achieved very high validity (average V = 0.894), the questionnaire instrument achieved high validity (average V = 0.872), and the project rubric achieved high validity (average V = 0.792). All indicators exceeded the minimum threshold (V ≥ 0.60), confirming that these 6C-integrated instruments and SOLO-taxonomy-based rubrics are valid and suitable for use. These instruments can serve as tools to transform conventional assessment into competency-based evaluation aligned with national energy strategic objectives.
References
Asy’ari, M., Ikhsan, M., & Muhali, M. (2018). Validitas Instrumen Karakterisasi Kemampuan Metakognisi Mahasiswa Calon Guru Fisika. Prisma Sains : Jurnal Pengkajian Ilmu Dan Pembelajaran Matematika Dan IPA IKIP Mataram, 6(1), 18. https://doi.org/10.33394/j-ps.v6i1.955
Bashir, M. F., Arshad, H., Javed, A. R., Kryvinska, N., & Band, S. S. (2021). Subjective Answers Evaluation Using Machine Learning and Natural Language Processing. IEEE Access, 9, 158972–158983. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3130902
Bashooir, K., & Supahar, S. (2018). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen asesmen kinerja literasi sains pelajaran fisika berbasis STEM. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(2), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i2.19590
Biggs, J. B., & Collis, K. F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The SOLO taxonomy (Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome). Academic Press.
Branch, R. M. (2009). Instructional design: The ADDIE approach. Springer Science & Business Media.
BRIN. (2026). BRIN perkuat fondasi SDM dan regulasi, siapkan Indonesia menuju PLTN pertama 2032. brin.go.id.
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2015). The systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.
Dujardin, R. , V. den B. L. , & L. G. (2023). Assessing engineering students’ preparedness for lifelong learning and self-reflection competency. 356–365.
Fernandez, P. J. M., & Guzon, A. F. H. (2025). A SOLO Taxonomy-based rubric for assessing conceptual understanding in applied calculus. Journal on Mathematics Education, 16(2), 559–580. https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v16i2.pp559-580
Fullan, M., Quinn, J., & McEachen, J. (2018). Deep learning: Engage the world change the world. Corwin.
Gabut, D. M. P., Rojo, M. E. M., Casas, W. C., Tondo, R. C., Mahilum, R. M., & Mutya, R. C. (2026). Comparing Surface and Deep Learning Strategies and Their Relationship to High School Students’ Academic Performance in Science. European Journal of Educational Research, 15(1), 199–210. https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.15.1.199
Gunawansyah, Rahayu, R., Nurwathi, Sugiarto, B., & Gunawan. (2020). Automated Essay Scoring Using Natural Language Processing And Text Mining Method. 2020 14th International Conference on Telecommunication Systems, Services, and Applications (TSSA, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSSA51342.2020.9310845
Isdayanti, A. A., Khusaini, K., & Taufiq, A. (2025). Implementation of Deep Learning to Improve Students’ Physics Learning Outcomes: A Systematic Literature Review. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 13(3), 402. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v13i3.22757
Kemendikbudristek. (2022). Buku panduan implementasi kurikulum merdeka di perguruan tinggi. Direktorat Jenderal Pendidikan Tinggi.
Kementerian Riset, T. dan P. T. (2017). Rencana induk riset nasional (RIRN) 2017–2045. Kemenristekdikti.
Lilley, J. (2021). Nuclear physics: Principles and applications (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Lintangesukmanjaya, R. T., Mahendra, A., Anugrah, S., Prahani, B. K., Dwikoranto, D., Satriawan, M., & Rizki, I. A. (2025). A EFA Analysis of Digital Technology Teaching Materials in Improving Students’ Critical Thinking in Physics Learning. JPPS (Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Sains), 23–38. https://doi.org/10.26740/jpps.v14n1.p23-38
Mardian, V., & Chandra, D. T. (2023). Development of the PTEAM (Physics, Technology, Engineering, Art, Mathematics) Approach by applying the SOLO Taxonomy. Science and Education, 2, 735–739.
Molenda, M. (2015). In Search of the Elusive ADDIE Model. Performance Improvement, 54(2), 40–42. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.21461
Nafi’ah, J., & Faruq, D. J. (2025). Conceptualizing Deep Learning Approach in Primary Education: Integrating Mindful, Meaningful, and Joyful. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 3(2), 225. https://doi.org/10.70376/jerp.v3i2.384
Papadimas, C., Ragazou, V., Karasavvidis, I., & Kollias, V. (2025). Predicting learning performance using NLP: an exploratory study using two semantic textual similarity methods. Knowledge and Information Systems, 67(5), 4567–4595. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-024-02293-2
Quinn, J., McEachen, J., Fullan, M., Gardner, M., & Drummy, M. (2020). Dive into deep learning: Tools for engagement. Corwin.
Retnawati, H. (2014). Validitas dan reliabilitas instrumen penelitian. UNY Press.
Smith, T. W., & Colby, S. A. (2007). Teaching for Deep Learning. The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 80(5), 205–210. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.80.5.205-210
Tajuddin, N. I. I., Abas, U.-H., Aziz, K. A., Nor, R. N. H., Izni, N. A. I., Sudin, M. N., Anim, N. A. H. M., & Noor, N. M. (2025). Content validity assessment using Aiken’s V: Knowledge integration model for blockchain in higher learning institutions. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications (IJACSA), 16 (6).
Wardi, L. Z., & Jauhariyah, M. N. R. (2025). Validity and reliability scientific literacy-based physics assessment instrument on atomic nucleus and radioactivity material. Momentum: Physics Education Journal, 9(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.21067/mpej.v9i1.10450
